🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, states are channeling hundreds of billions into what is known as “sovereign AI” – developing national AI systems. From Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are competing to build AI that grasps native tongues and cultural specifics.

The Global AI Arms Race

This trend is part of a larger global competition led by tech giants from the US and the People's Republic of China. While companies like OpenAI and Meta allocate massive capital, developing countries are likewise making sovereign investments in the AI field.

Yet amid such vast investments involved, can developing nations secure significant advantages? As noted by a analyst from an influential thinktank, If not you’re a wealthy state or a major firm, it’s quite a hardship to develop an LLM from the ground up.”

Security Issues

Many states are hesitant to use overseas AI technologies. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for example, Western-developed AI solutions have occasionally been insufficient. An illustrative example involved an AI tool employed to teach learners in a distant area – it interacted in English with a thick American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional listeners.

Then there’s the defence dimension. In India’s military authorities, employing specific external AI tools is considered inadmissible. According to a entrepreneur noted, It's possible it contains some unvetted training dataset that could claim that, for example, a certain region is separate from India … Utilizing that particular model in a security environment is a major risk.”

He added, “I have spoken to individuals who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, forget about certain models, they prefer not to rely on US platforms because details may be transferred overseas, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Projects

Consequently, several nations are funding local initiatives. One such initiative is being developed in the Indian market, where a company is working to develop a national LLM with state support. This project has allocated about a substantial sum to artificial intelligence advancement.

The expert imagines a system that is significantly smaller than premier tools from American and Asian corporations. He states that the country will have to compensate for the financial disparity with skill. “Being in India, we do not possess the advantage of investing billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we contend versus say the enormous investments that the United States is investing? I think that is where the key skills and the strategic thinking plays a role.”

Regional Priority

Across Singapore, a state-backed program is supporting machine learning tools developed in the region's local dialects. These tongues – such as the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and additional ones – are commonly underrepresented in Western-developed LLMs.

I hope the individuals who are building these independent AI tools were conscious of how rapidly and the speed at which the cutting edge is advancing.

A senior director participating in the project says that these tools are designed to enhance bigger systems, as opposed to substituting them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he comments, frequently find it challenging to handle regional languages and culture – speaking in unnatural Khmer, as an example, or proposing meat-containing dishes to Malay users.

Building regional-language LLMs allows state agencies to incorporate cultural sensitivity – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a advanced technology developed overseas.

He continues, I am cautious with the concept independent. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we wish to be more accurately reflected and we want to understand the capabilities” of AI technologies.

Cross-Border Collaboration

Regarding states trying to find their place in an escalating global market, there’s an alternative: team up. Researchers associated with a prominent institution put forward a public AI company distributed among a group of emerging states.

They term the project “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, modeled after the European effective strategy to create a rival to Boeing in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would involve the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the assets of different countries’ AI programs – for example the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and Sweden – to develop a viable alternative to the American and Asian major players.

The lead author of a paper outlining the initiative notes that the proposal has attracted the interest of AI leaders of at least three countries so far, as well as a number of national AI organizations. While it is now centered on “middle powers”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have likewise shown curiosity.

He explains, In today’s climate, I think it’s just a fact there’s diminished faith in the assurances of this current US administration. Individuals are wondering for example, should we trust any of this tech? Suppose they decide to